Book 'em: Four Sentenced to 7+ Years in Library Theft
An Audubon sketch similar to those stolen (from Transylvania U. website).
By Michael Stillman
The case has not garnered the notoriety of the Forbes Smiley case, where the New England map seller allegedly sliced valuable old maps from Yale and other libraries' rare book collections. However, four young men from Kentucky will be spending the next six years behind bars for their recent rare book theft. The bizarre theft took place on December 17, 2004, when one of the men entered the Special Collections Library at Transylvania University in Lexington. At the time, they had already sent emails to Christie's in New York expressing their interest in an appraisal and sale of a group of rare books.
Reportedly, the four had planned an earlier attempt at the library dressed in strange disguises, reminiscent of some movie plot, but the attempt had fallen through. Not so with the second try. After one defendant made his way into the library and provided entrance to a comrade, they tied up librarian B.J. Gooch. Gooch was blindfolded and some sort of stunning device was used to subdue her. They proceeded to gather the books they wanted, but trouble with an elevator alerted a second librarian. The men fled, dropping several of the books along the way, before effecting their escape. They then drove to New York, showing up at Christie's two days later, attempting to sell their cache. Christie's became suspicious and the men returned with their books, but no money, to Kentucky.
Ultimately, the email address used to contact Christie's and the library to set up appointments enabled the police to locate and arrest the thieves a few weeks later. The four pleaded guilty in April, and were sentenced on December 7, 2005. All four, Warren Lipka, Erik Borsuk, Charles Allen, and Spencer Reinhard, were sentenced to 7 years and 3 months each, and will have to spend a minimum of just over 6 years before any possibility of release. At least one of the defendants is appealing a part of the sentence which resulted in 17 of the 87 months assessed. The four were reportedly high school friends and all were 20 years of age at the time of the crime.
The major items taken in the theft included some Audubon sketches, a first edition of Darwin's Origin of the Species, and two manuscripts. Both the prosecution and defense agreed these items were worth an estimated $735,000. However, two issues were disputed before the judge for sentencing purposes. One was whether a stun gun or stun pen used to subdue the librarian was a "dangerous weapon." The defense argued that while inflicting a shock, it was not dangerous. The judge did not buy that argument, but the 17 months tacked on for the dangerous weapon is the item one of the defendants is appealing. The second issue was whether books grabbed by the defendants, but dropped while still in the library as they fled, should be counted among the stolen goods. On this one, the judge sided with the defendants, that those items were not stolen.
|
Book 'em: Four Sentenced to 7+ Years in Library Theft
none
Supposedly, the defendants have shown remorse for their actions. One was reported to have said, "I'll be a better person for this (the punishment)." Who knows? It's hard to say how six years in prison will affect four young people who appear more like immature, selfish fools than hardened street criminals. Certainly, they will be changed. Hopefully, they will have learned something. Even more importantly, we hope their hard lesson will be instructive to others who think to emulate their ways. Library theft seems to be becoming a growing problem as the value of rare books and maps continues to escalate, and thieves expose weaknesses in library security. Unfortunately, we expect their lesson will probably have about as much effect on other would-be criminals as those warnings about AIDS have on young people's sexual behavior. Not all that much. Substantially tighter security is likely the only way to secure these valuable resources from those who see easy money lining the library shelves.
As for those young men, it could have been worse. Judge Jennifer Coffman did enforce the suggested federal sentencing guidelines, but picked the sentence at the lowest end of the spectrum. Much opportunity for advancement has been lost for these young people, but they will get another chance in life. Still, 2012 is a long way away. That's when we will be deciding whether to re-elect President Hillary Clinton, or President McCain, or is it President Guliani, Edwards, Jeb Bush, Cheney? Our world will have moved forward, but theirs will stand still.
|