Advanced Search





Article Archives Search

Archives

  • April, 2013
  • March, 2013
  • February, 2013
  • January, 2013
  • December, 2012
  • November, 2012
  • select

AE Monthly

AE Articles

 
Academia’s Dirty Little Secret: De-Accession by Dumpster

- By Susan Halas

One prominent American university library de-accesions by dumpster.

While I was working on this month’s AE story “Seller Beware” I posted some comments to an on-line book listserve describing my recent experience that went something like this: In the 1970s a little New England public library gave away a small collection of items related to Hawaii that had been donated to it at the beginning of the 20th century.

But, when I called them to verify that they had disposed of these items, and they found out the collection has come to market four decades later with a hefty price, suddenly what they disposed of “ to make space” were now valuable items that had been “inadvertently disposed of.”

Within 24 hours of my call they had retained an attorney and plan to try and “recover our materials.” In my email to the listserve I asked if any of my colleagues had run into similar situations?

Here are a series of shocking emails I received on the subject of what happens to books when one prominent academic library doesn’t want them anymore.

The writer is a veteran staffer at a big name American state university library. The text has been lightly edited to protect the identity of the whistle-blower.

“I know of one institutional library so afraid of this sort of thing they used to make midnight runs to "de-acquisition by dumpster" all the gifts and duplicates they culled in triple sealed boxes. Really amazing stuff, too!

Enough to make the collector or dealer cry.

Wouldn't even consider selling the material (I naively tried to arrange a third-party sale) lest the donor someday find out--which I guess is exactly what had happened just prior to this knee-jerk policy.

Better to accept the gift--and covertly trash it-- than decline or sell it.

 

To be fair -- the institution later reversed course and began "charitably" sending some boxes over-seas to any place conveniently far away enough they'd not be bothered for an explanation (like Hawaii? LOL)  This earned them "green points," and more importantly, I think, saved them tipping fees at the landfill.” 
 

 

Tell me more I responded, and soon received this reply:

I was newly hired at XYZ University Library back in the year XXXX and I was stationed near the area where the gifts were sorted.

I would often browse the trucks of new gifts and donations that were awaiting selector decisions (catalog or toss) and since I had an appreciation for the material they sometimes consulted me. 

I started asking questions about what became of the material the library culled and didn't want?

I was told that if it was bought with collection development money (state money) or was in any way identifiable as a gift from a donor it was to be destroyed, because they couldn't sell it or give it away --- the dean had recently been chewed out by a wealthy donor who had found a book-plated book s/he had donated at the local book sale. 

Throw Them Out – Just In Case


This translated for a good while into a policy to throw most books out - just in case. 

The books were boxed in unmarked boxes until trash day, and then disposed of at night and staff was forbidden to fish them out. 

Still makes me angry, though nowadays, more boxes are thankfully going to the XYZ book sale (new administration). Even so, there are still stacks of unmarked boxes waiting for the trash that I try not to think about every time I pass by. 

I know that all books weeded from the stacks continue to be destroyed and they actually go so far as to physically destroy them first by having student workers rip the covers off! 

Librarians in my experience are not collectors.

And duplicates?  They never checked for condition -- they'd throw out a mint first edition or vintage paperback if they had a ratty later printing already on the shelf. 
 

I transferred to another department and have been making a valiant attempt, albeit a quiet lonely one, to upgrade the collection in this regard by paying attention to printings, states, and condition whenever I receive a choice book that is a duplicate.

Academia’s Dirty Little Secret: De-Accession by Dumpster

- By Susan Halas

I wrote back that I was truly shocked. This was the reply:

 

“This was pretty much my same reaction nine and ten years ago -- but I guess I was a bit naive about institutional politics and the dark side of collection development in academia. 

No one really wanted to hear the whistle I was blowing. And as an avid bibliophile I was aware my motives could easily be perceived as suspicious: conflict of interest and all that.

No one in the administration dared risk taking a stand to change the policy -- unwanted gift book and duplicate material was not worth their tenure-track careers. Everyone said something should and could be done, but that was that.

A supervisor even went so far as to let me rescue a few items "as long as no one complained" but then back-peddled when a member of the administration saw me searching through the boxes and tried to have me fired.

I decided it wasn't worth it for me either. I am the only one of the people mentioned above who is still at the library. And everyone now at XYZ has other fish to fry…. with budget cuts, etc.

Pretty Much Universal”


I think this practice is pretty much universal in the state (though I could never get anyone to explain to me the logic of why state-funded books could not be sold?) 

Giving them away to faculty or privileged staff, I understand, probably borders on unethical--but why not have them equitably distributed or sold or put out to bid for real dollars to support the university?

Gets my dander up for sure, but I don't think there's much of a cure.

I eventually turned a blind-eye. I'll look more closely to confirm what is and isn't getting tossed right now but I'd be very careful before upsetting the apple cart.

Gifts are a Nuisance


I don't much care for Better World Books, but it is exactly that model with the patina of non-profit that the former regime would've jumped all over to be rid of the nuisance books -- and nuisance is how they sometimes view gifts.

A collection development phrase I often hear is 'gifts aren't free' -- I guess an Association of Research Libraries study was done that demonstrated that the average gift book costs $20 or $30 dollars in accessioning costs (which is probably true). 

Still, the bibliophile that I am has a hard time reducing books to the measure of a commodity. That's probably why I can't even move in my garage: I have a hoarder’s instinct when it comes to books. Maybe the library is doing us all a favor by pitching the detritus (as surely a lot of the books are).

 

Anyway, that's my rant for the evening. Thanks for sharing my vintage outrage.

I wrote back asking if the writer was still at XYZ U, the response was:

 

Yes, I've been with XYZ University now for XX years and have a career in the library.

It is a BIG organization with many campuses across the state. It is ranked in the top ten research libraries. And I am almost certain the practice here is not uncommon.

In fact I went to a Friends of the Library sale in a nearby public library, and they too were pitching the discarded books -- I was talking to the lady at the checkout asking what they did with discards? She was surprised I was interested, because she didn't think people wanted old library books.

I guess they had tried before with older dated reference books and they didn't move at the sale. 

Academia’s Dirty Little Secret: De-Accession by Dumpster

- By Susan Halas

Threw Away the Bound Civil War Era Periodicals


She went on to tell me they had recently cleaned out a whole section of leather bound periodicals dating back to before the Civil War (Harper’s, Atlantic Monthly) in preparation for a renovation; about forty or fifty volumes were pitched directly in the trash early that week.

She told me where the dumpster was and I ran out there at 10:00 p.m. in the dark, but it was filled over with construction debris and I was unable to retrieve the books. 

This is common practice on all levels, it appears. I blame overwhelmed or ignorant staff. 

Another practice I've been trying to combat in the public libraries here is that those that do sell the discarded children's books routinely mutilate the books by tearing out the pages with the card pockets.

I keep telling them I would've bought most of their jacketed award-winning and classic children's picture books if they had not torn out the fly-leaf or endpaper or whatever. 

The one small concession I've noticed is that they've started to just tear out only part of the page now (which I still won't buy -- including three Sendak titles just this past week!)

 

I think the internet has made books way too common and price-wrecked most of the good mainstream reading material to the point it is not economical to change the culture to deal with the bulk. 

Rather than shaking a stick at the organizations (which generally I believe are trying to do their best with the dwindling resources they have available) I think the only thing we can do (if our aim is to change the system) is develop a sure-fire alternative method of processing what is viewed as a waste-stream into an income stream (cost vs. benefit).

Legal issues with ownership of the material and withdrawal, logistics of transport and storage, sale and disposal of unsellable books would all have to be addressed. This is what Better World Books is capitalizing on.

And the trend in libraries now is to move toward electronic resources (think Kindle) so there is a lot of pressure to reduce the size of traditional physical collections to just those core volumes that show solid use statistics -- everything else can be sourced from Google or other partners online. 

In academia … books are generally considered tools to be used, not sacred objects to be shelved, cherished and admired. 

This is the mindset that allows the powers that be to quickly consider tossing what is not easily quantifiable as valuable or readily understood as important -- like Hawaiiana collection you described.

AE writer Susan Halas can be reached at wailukusue@gmail.com